2015 No. 2(10)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction (Krystyna Wojtczak)

I. PAPERS

ANDRZEJ BATOR, On the adequacy of the assumptions of the derivative concept of interpretation for the study of interpretation of European Union law

ANDŻELIKA GODEK, On legal situations and the interpretation of European Union law

TOMASZ BARANKIEWICZ, About the interpretative benefits of British analytical philosophy

JAROSŁAW MIKOŁAJEWICZ, On the maxim of clara non sunt interpretanda

HANNA PALUSZKIEWICZ, Judicial cognition in brief. The judicial scene after amendments to the Code of Criminal Procedure

AGNIESZKA CHODUŃ, Maciej Zieliński’s (derivative) concept of legal interpretation

II. COMMENTARIES, OPINION AND POLEMICS

OLGIERD BOGUCKI, Expert opinions and functional interpretation – some remarks in the context of the principle of iura novit curia

AGNIESZKA PYRZYŃSKA, Some remarks on the interpretation of civil law

MICHAŁ BIAŁKOWSKI, The derivative concept of legal interpretation

MAŁGORZATA ŻBIKOWSKA, The Supreme Court’s application of a derivative concept of the interpretation of law in the resolution by seven judges of 27 February 2013, I KZP 26/12

III. JUDICIAL DECISIONS AND CASE REPORTS

KALIKST NAGEL, Legal definitions in the interpretation of law. Report on the judgment of the Supreme Court of 12 October 2011, II CSK 63/11

MAŁGORZATA SZYDA-BŁASZAK, On the binding interpretation of law in the judgment of the Supreme Court of 12 July 2012, I CSK 5/12

KRZYSZTOF JANAS, Report on the judgment of the Regional Administrative Court in Poznań of 4 June 2014, IV SA/Po 951/13

IV. LITERATURE REVIEW

Review of Polish literature

Maria Kruk, Jan Wawrzyniak (eds), Transformacja ustrojowa w Polsce 1989–2009 (Political transformation in Poland between 1989–2009), Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar, Warszawa 2011 (by Paweł Kokot)

Tatiana Chauvin, Homo iuridicus. Człowiek jako podmiot prawa publicznego (Homo iuridicus. Man as a subject of public law), Wydawnictwo C.H. Beck, Warszawa 2014 (by Kalikst Nagel)

Review of foreign law journals

Mark Dawson, How Does the European Court of Justice Reason? A Review Essay on the Legal Reasoning of the European Court of Justice, “European Law Journal” 2014, vol. 20, iss. 3 (by Agnieszka Narożniak)

Laverne Jacobs, From Rawls to Habermas: Toward A Theory of Grounded Impartiality in Canadian Administrative Law, “Osgoode Hall Law Journal” 2014, vol. 51, no. 2 (by Konrad Różowicz)

Victoria Nourse, Elementary Statutory Interpretation: Rethinking Legislative Intent and History, “Boston College Law Review” 2014, vol. 55, iss. 5 (by Konrad Różowicz)

Paul Daly, Unreasonable Interpretations of Law, “Supreme Court Law Review” 2014, no. 66 (by Lucyna Staniszewska)

V. REPORTS AND INFORMATION

Proceedings from the Scholarly Conference of the Staff of Public Economic Law Units of Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań and Wrocław University, Wrocław, 22–23 May 2014 (by Anna Trela)

Report on the XXI Meeting of Chairs of the Theory of the Law and the Philosophy of Law: “A Democratic State of Law”, Augustów, 14–17 September 2014 (by Karolina Gmerek)

Information on Authors

Information for Authors